From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25979 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 10:06:56 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Mar 1999 10:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 4839 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 1999 10:06:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5799 Received: (qmail 4832 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 10:06:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:06:24 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199903151006.LAA22992@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:26:50 -0800 Subject: Re: Non-intuitive completion Bart Schaefer wrote: > I notice this patch isn't in pws-11. Is it made irrelevant by the new > completion stuff? If not, can anyone think of a way to test whether > it's the right thing to do WRT not breaking other uses of zerr() ? It isn't irrelevant, both normal and new style completion still show this bug (which is actually caused by the code for expand-or-complete before the completion code gets to it). But I still don't know how to find out if it is the right way to do it. I once had it in one of my versions (of course) and didn't see any unexpected behavior but that is certainly far from a complete test. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de