From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7387 invoked from network); 25 Jun 1999 09:19:59 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Jun 1999 09:19:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 7825 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 1999 09:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6846 Received: (qmail 7818 invoked from network); 25 Jun 1999 09:19:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:19:48 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199906250919.LAA02681@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:03:15 +0000 Subject: Re: 3.0.6-pre-5 problem Bart Schaefer wrote: > } Anyway, I couldn't reproduce it but there is no harm in adding some > } security code to execpline(). I guess this will not apply cleanly to > } 3.0.6, though. > > I think this patch (6838) should NOT be applied, and we need a different > one instead. Look here: Have you tried it with 6819 and 6824 (I forgot to mention the latter, sorry)? With them (and pws-23) I can't reproduce it and both of them could influence it (especially 6824, which fixed a bug with suspending functions that garbled the job-table entry). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de