From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12975 invoked from network); 25 Jun 1999 15:56:55 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Jun 1999 15:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 4980 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 1999 15:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6856 Received: (qmail 4973 invoked from network); 25 Jun 1999 15:56:36 -0000 Message-Id: <199906251556.RAA04789@hydra.ifh.de> X-Authentication-Warning: hydra.ifh.de: pws owned process doing -bs To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: 3.0.6-pre-5 problem In-reply-to: "Sven Wischnowsky"'s message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:52:58 DFT." <199906251252.OAA02488@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:56:33 +0200 From: Peter Stephenson (I tried to reply to this several times before but it doesn't seem to have worked, due to the @!$*! disk being full again.) Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > So, if we have agreed to use the kill-loop-patches, we'll have to make > sure that every decent interactive zsh with job-control runs in its > own process group which is what the patch below does. Does this have implications for sending signals from the Ctrl-Button1 menu of an xterm, not that that ever worked for me anyway? By the way, although this is totally unrelated, looking at this I discovered that SHELL=/usr/bin/ksh xterm & creates an xterm with terminal settings messed up. Without the & it's OK. -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy