From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8609 invoked from network); 29 Jun 1999 12:29:22 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Jun 1999 12:29:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 21846 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 1999 12:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6920 Received: (qmail 21824 invoked from network); 29 Jun 1999 12:28:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:28:40 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: public CVS archive Message-ID: <19990629142840.A28884@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Zsh hackers list References: <199906281751.TAA17561@hydra.ifh.de> <000001bec210$8f5cee10$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <000001bec210$8f5cee10$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>; from Andrej Borsenkow on Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 01:19:59PM +0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT According to Andrej Borsenkow: > I believe, 3.0.6 should be there as well. I don't know CVS good enough to > decide, if it is worth making it a branch or just separate > package. Making this a branch is probably too much overhead. As long as you don't have a myriad of branches, CVS is fine. Having to branches, one for 3.0.x and the other for 3.1.x is bearable. It makes merging easier. Having a anoncvs server for zsh would be very nice. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/TEC -=- roberto@eurocontrol.fr The Postman hits! The Postman hits! You have new mail.