From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17182 invoked from network); 9 Jul 1999 08:19:38 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Jul 1999 08:19:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2484 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 1999 08:19:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7055 Received: (qmail 2476 invoked from network); 9 Jul 1999 08:19:27 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:19:25 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199907090819.KAA13084@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:47:48 +0400 Subject: Re: accept-and-infer-next-history in path completion Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > > This makes accept-and-infer-next-history be treated specially when in > > menu-selection. It accepts the current match and immediatly starts > > completion again. So if you have a list of files, place the mark on a > > directory and execute a-a-i-n-h, you can select files in that > > directory. Of course it would be nice to be able to go back again, > > e.g. with undo, but implementing that is a bit more complicated... > > It just occured to me, that it is quite useful in path completion. E.g. if you > have something like > > /tools/{share,src}/z/bla-bla-bla > > it is nice to hit a single key to accept ``share'' or ``src'' and immediately > continue completion after that. That's what I had in mind. > In this case a-a-i-n-h is probably misnomer ... > something like accept-and-continue-completion would be better. Sure it is. I just had to take what's there. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de