From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24914 invoked from network); 31 Aug 1999 10:48:49 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 1999 10:48:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20037 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 1999 10:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7570 Received: (qmail 20029 invoked from network); 31 Aug 1999 10:48:27 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:27:46 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: 6-pws-2 Message-ID: <19990831112746.A51854@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Zsh hackers list References: <9908301600.AA12634@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <9908301600.AA12634@ibmth.df.unipi.it>; from Peter Stephenson on Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 06:00:22PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT According to Peter Stephenson: > - Personally, I prefer one single completion function for a suite of > related commands like cvs or pbm, since the accumulated clutter (and > added time to process completion files the first time) is large. If it I do heartily agree to that, I'd hate to see zsh going into the path of "let's read a zillion files on startup", first experienced by Perl and its module syndrom... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/TEC -=- roberto@eurocontrol.fr The Postman hits! The Postman hits! You have new mail.