From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10122 invoked from network); 7 Sep 1999 09:10:22 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Sep 1999 09:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 27734 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 1999 09:10:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7683 Received: (qmail 27726 invoked from network); 7 Sep 1999 09:10:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:10:01 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: _rpm fixes Message-ID: <19990907101001.A7292@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk References: <199909070820.KAA03650@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <199909070820.KAA03650@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>; from Sven Wischnowsky on Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 10:20:16AM +0200 X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: Linux 2.2.9 i686 Sven Wischnowsky (wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de) wrote: > > Adam Spiers wrote: > > > ... > > > > I also fixed -b to complete .spec files. It > > was completing installed rpms before for some reason. > > I don't know `rpm' very well and the documentation I have is very > imprecise, that's why I was asking for help when I first sent the > `Rpm/*' functions. > > Is the rest of the function ok? I haven't played with it much yet (still discovering the joys of all the bells and whistles with the new completion system, e.g. description_format with group_matches, which is GREAT!) but I use rpm a fair bit so of course I'll fix any more problems I find. At first glance however it looks fantastic. Pressing tab after `rpm -b' and getting: > rpm -b build stage a -- build binary and source packages b -- build a binary package c -- execute build stage i -- execute install stage l -- do a list check p -- execute %prep stage blew my mind! gcc, anyone? 8-)