From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 744 invoked from network); 10 Sep 1999 15:47:11 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Sep 1999 15:47:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 827 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 1999 15:47:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7771 Received: (qmail 819 invoked from network); 10 Sep 1999 15:47:03 -0000 Message-Id: <199909101546.RAA13547@paris.ifh.de> X-Authentication-Warning: paris.ifh.de: pws owned process doing -bs To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Size of select listing? In-reply-to: "Oliver Kiddle"'s message of "Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:23:29 BST." <37D92271.182ECD11@u.genie.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:46:57 +0200 From: Peter Stephenson Oliver Kiddle wrote: > It doesn't so much relate to handling the screen size but, one area > which I really don't like about the way _arguments and _long_options > work is the way options are considered possible matches straight-away. Look at the option_prefix configuration key in zshcompsys(1). -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy