From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20334 invoked from network); 12 Sep 1999 21:25:56 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Sep 1999 21:25:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 20786 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 1999 21:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7786 Received: (qmail 20779 invoked from network); 12 Sep 1999 21:25:42 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 22:25:38 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: _hosts, _hostports, _telnet and _socket Message-ID: <19990912222538.A26184@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk References: <990912022006.ZM18909@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Tanaka Akira on Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 12:36:25PM +0900 X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: Linux 2.2.9 i686 Tanaka Akira (akr@jaist.ac.jp) wrote: > Definitely this is better way to specify the relation between hosts > and ports. So, I modified `_hosts', `_socket' and `_telnet'. Cool, this is nice. It would also be nice to have something similar for (user, host) pairs, for use with finger, [ny]talk, ssh etc.