From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7727 invoked from network); 16 Sep 1999 15:38:36 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Sep 1999 15:38:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 14839 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 1999 15:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7867 Received: (qmail 14832 invoked from network); 16 Sep 1999 15:38:25 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:38:23 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: _mutt, _mailboxes Message-ID: <19990916163823.A17248@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk References: <199909161311.PAA01349@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <199909161311.PAA01349@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: Linux 2.2.9 i686 Sven Wischnowsky (wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de) wrote: > And while I'm at it... I'm the only one who writes option > descriptions, it seems, which I can understand considering how tedious > that is. So my question is: if an option gets only one argument, > should we turn it's description automatically into the > option-description? Probably prefixed by something like `specify: '? Sounds like a good idea. How about a configuration key which in this case would be something like `specify: %s'? Adam