From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-7869-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 7938 invoked from network); 16 Sep 1999 15:54:38 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Sep 1999 15:54:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 18002 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 1999 15:54:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 7869
Received: (qmail 17995 invoked from network); 16 Sep 1999 15:54:32 -0000
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:54:31 +0100
From: Adam Spiers <adam@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>
To: zsh workers mailing list <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: _man only uses $manpath
Message-ID: <19990916165431.D17248@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
Mail-Followup-To: zsh workers mailing list <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i
X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/
X-OS: Linux 2.2.9 i686

Shouldn't _man calculate man page completions using `man -w' rather
than $manpath?  For me, $manpath is always empty, so man doesn't
complete anything.

Is it safe to assume that `-w' is present in all sensible versions of
man?