From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6033 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 15:08:21 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Sep 1999 15:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10908 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 1999 15:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8112 Received: (qmail 10901 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 15:08:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:07:41 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: Zefram Cc: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: "sh" job control Message-ID: <19990930110741.B13153@dman.com> References: <9909301408.AA16679@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: > I think CHECK_JOBS (with the opposite sense) would be a better name. I think that's reasonable. > Btw, you put SH_JOB_CONTROL out of alphabetical sequence. Ah, yes. I was mentally inserting spaces between the words. > What does POSIX say about it? I don't know, but while we're on the subject, can anyone confirm or deny that bash's implementation of the 'command' builtin (command [-pVv] ...) is POSIX?