From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-8114-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 6311 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 15:27:50 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Sep 1999 15:27:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 13173 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 1999 15:27:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 8114
Received: (qmail 13164 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 15:27:42 -0000
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:27:22 -0400
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@ibmth.df.unipi.it>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: PATCH: "sh" job control
Message-ID: <19990930112722.A13488@dman.com>
References: <E11WhZy-00015a-00@crucigera.fysh.org> <9909301444.AA15947@ibmth.df.unipi.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <9909301444.AA15947@ibmth.df.unipi.it>

> I can't see anything in the Single UNIX Specification, anyway.  The nohup
> description refers to the sh description, but doesn't seem to specify it
> one way or another.

Is 'emulate sh' aiming for SUS or POSIX compliance?