From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7993 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 17:35:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 17:35:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22728 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 1999 17:35:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8142 Received: (qmail 22718 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 17:35:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:35:04 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: Zsh workers Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: _man copes with : delimited manpath Message-ID: <19991006183504.A9891@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: Zsh workers References: <19990927141724.B10336@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> <37FB7732.77D9B5EA@u.genie.co.uk> <19991006182459.A9694@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <19991006182459.A9694@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: Linux 2.2.12 i686 Adam Spiers, on thelonious (adam@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk) wrote: > Was I wrong in thinking that this was a typo? Or did you just > accidentally unfix my fix? :-) Agh, ignore that; I read the patch the wrong way round. Like I said ... > P.S. Am I alone in finding context diffs remarkably awkward to read? But it still looks this patch replaces two or more of the previous _man patches. Which ones?