From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-8169-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 29048 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 17:03:34 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 17:03:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 28333 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 1999 17:03:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 8169
Received: (qmail 28326 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 17:03:25 -0000
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 13:03:20 -0400
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
To: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: PATCH: prompt fun
Message-ID: <19991007130320.B4365@dman.com>
References: <19991007124516.A4365@dman.com> <E11ZGjV-0002Cs-00@crucigera.fysh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i
In-Reply-To: <E11ZGjV-0002Cs-00@crucigera.fysh.org>

> Yes, that's the zsh license.

So the authors of such additions could easily put their code under
the GPL with a special provision to allow inclusion by zsh.

Shouldn't the copyright be updated?