From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-8158-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 24820 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 13:23:24 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 13:23:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 6733 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 1999 13:23:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 8158
Received: (qmail 6726 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 13:23:19 -0000
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:23:18 +0100
From: Adam Spiers <adam@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: _other_accounts
Message-ID: <19991007142318.B19339@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
References: <37FC7492.69F33CD0@u.genie.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <37FC7492.69F33CD0@u.genie.co.uk>
X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/
X-OS: Linux 2.2.12 i686

Oliver Kiddle (opk@u.genie.co.uk) wrote:
> What is the last line of _other_accounts attempting to do - it seems to
> be calling the command '_user@host' which doesn't exist.

You missed a patch which renamed _user@host to _user_at_host.

> finger and
> ytalk should have reasonably sensible completions if the verious arrays
> haven't been set by the user but I can't quite see what it is doing.

But what default completions would be sensible?