From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21361 invoked from network); 11 Oct 1999 11:22:51 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Oct 1999 11:22:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 23726 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 1999 11:22:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8202 Received: (qmail 23717 invoked from network); 11 Oct 1999 11:22:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:22:19 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199910111122.NAA03139@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Adam Spiers's message of Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:28:09 +0100 Subject: Re: PATCH: improvement to user@host completions Adam Spiers wrote: > There's also the `Completion System Configuration' section of the info > pages. Is it a deliberate choice that descriptions of most of the > standard completion functions (e.g. _dirs, _users, _groups) are > missing from the info pages? If not, should they go in the `Utility > Functions' section, or maybe in a new section immediately following it? Deliberate in the sense that noone (at least not me) took the time to write that. *But* I already wished we had it, too. So, if you offer to write them: yes, please ;-) I'd vote for a separate section because the function in `Utility Functions' don't generate the matches themselves, they are told what should be added, whereas functions like `_users' decide that for themselves. (This may also be a bit of a banana problem: `_x_colors' and friends?) > Out of curiosity, has anyone any ideas on what the official release > plans are for the near future? 3.1.7 soon, or not? Are there any > more big plans for 3.2? At least I am only still dreaming of a generic package system (to replace the ad hoc compinit and friends) and of a cleanup for the keymap stuff. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de