From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27864 invoked from network); 15 Oct 1999 16:54:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Oct 1999 16:54:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 2901 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 1999 16:54:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8293 Received: (qmail 2888 invoked from network); 15 Oct 1999 16:54:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 17:54:07 +0100 From: Adam Spiers To: Zsh workers Subject: _urls ... and CVS Message-ID: <19991015175407.A19450@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: Zsh workers References: <199910151210.OAA18066@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <38074889.6DCA13F@u.genie.co.uk> <991015155008.ZM24081@candle.brasslantern.com> <380750E1.EF125897@u.genie.co.uk> <991015164015.ZM24179@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <991015164015.ZM24179@candle.brasslantern.com> X-URL: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: Linux 2.2.12 i686 Bart Schaefer (schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com) wrote: > On Oct 15, 5:05pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > } Subject: Re: PATCH: _urls again (Re: setopt localoptions noautoremoveslash > } > } The patch is correct: extendedglob is required by _urls. > > The patch is broken at my end by line folding in transit ... but it's > also subsumed by Tanaka's 8286. Can some kind person please email me correctly-patched _urls? Mine got badly messed up somehow. Ouch, I'm getting desperate for CVS now. Since Bart and Sven are probably currently the most active developers, perhaps they would like to decide what to do about it? As has been mentioned, either we keep following the `benign dictatorship' route by someone taking over pws' role, or we have a select few developers with write-access to the CVS repository. Or we ditch the whole CVS idea, but it doesn't seem like anyone thinks it's anything other than a good idea. What would be really nice is to incorporate some kind of moderation layer into the CVS commit wrappers, so that anyone could perform a CVS commit, but it would only take place after the patch had been mailed to one or more moderators for approval. Is that unrealistic?