From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21170 invoked from network); 25 Oct 1999 08:15:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Oct 1999 08:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22314 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 1999 08:15:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8400 Received: (qmail 22307 invoked from network); 25 Oct 1999 08:15:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 10:14:49 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199910250814.KAA05071@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Mon, 25 Oct 1999 10:11:35 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: compconfig[list_condition] I wrote: > Oops. I first used `BLINES' and then thought someone might complain > that it's too short or not different enough from `LINES'. The patch > below fixes this. Ahem. Bye Sven diff -u olddoc/Zsh/zle.yo Doc/Zsh/zle.yo --- olddoc/Zsh/zle.yo Thu Oct 21 08:59:22 1999 +++ Doc/Zsh/zle.yo Mon Oct 25 09:58:21 1999 @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ If it is assigned to, only that part of the buffer is replaced, and the cursor remains between the old tt($LBUFFER) and the new tt($RBUFFER). ) -vindex(BLINES) -item(tt(BLINES))( +vindex(BUFFERLINES) +item(tt(BUFFERLINES))( The number of screen lines needed for the edit buffer currently displayed on screen (i.e. without any changes to the preceding parameters done after the last redisplay). -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de