From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18432 invoked from network); 3 Nov 1999 08:22:19 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Nov 1999 08:22:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7248 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 1999 08:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8509 Received: (qmail 7241 invoked from network); 3 Nov 1999 08:22:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 09:22:12 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199911030822.JAA00163@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Adam Spiers's message of Tue, 2 Nov 1999 16:50:34 +0000 Subject: Re: release management Adam Spiers wrote: > ... > > I may be wrong, but it seems to me that the key developers amongst us > don't feel an urgent need for some central CVS (or other) > repository[0]. This is presumably because after years of hacking > they're genuine gurus when it comes to applying patches of all > different shapes, sizes and ages to zsh. [ ... ] Well, I have these reasons: - Almost no experience with CVS. - Enough other things to do. - I'm lazy. But I think noone would really object if you offer to put up an (more or less) official CVS server. Although I think most people around here hoped that it would be build at sunsite.auc.dk -- in fact Karsten once offered us the space for a CVS server, if I remember correctly. Since I don't know CVS, I don't know how difficult it would be to move the server from your host to sunsite if that ever becomes possible (not too hard, I guess?). Anyway, my opinion in this case probably shouldn't count that much considering that -- ahem -- I have fewer patches to apply than most of you. Ahem. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de