From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4389 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1999 10:39:55 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Dec 1999 10:39:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25557 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 1999 10:39:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9082 Received: (qmail 25550 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1999 10:39:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:39:48 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199912161039.LAA13865@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:56:07 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: zsh and memory I wrote: > I'm really tempted to allocate heaps using mmap() > (anonymous) to get them out of the way of the zalloc() allocator. I > small test showed that with this I only get 39KB of free memory after > the completion test, which is really not too bad. I don't have a patch > for that yet, though. ... and now I don't think I'll ever write one: neither Solaris nor Linux seem to have MAP_ANONYMOUS. Sniff. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de