From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20670 invoked from network); 17 Dec 1999 14:01:45 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 Dec 1999 14:01:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7348 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 1999 14:01:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9106 Received: (qmail 7339 invoked from network); 17 Dec 1999 14:01:32 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:01:27 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199912171401.PAA11632@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Docs damaged Doc/Makefile.in creates the txinodes() for modules automatically, but it doesn't prepend the `zsh/' to the next/previous-node fields and the noderef()s used in the text, but it *does* prepend it to the module-name in the module's node itself. Leading to lots of validation errors when the info files are made. Andrew: is this really the right way to do it? When we start shipping modules in other name-spaces than `zsh/' we'll have to make this differently anyway, so why not do it now? Or will every module we distribute be in `zsh/'? (Sorry if this was discussed before, I didn't follow the discussion about the hierarchical module naming too closely until it came over me...) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de