From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15507 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2000 16:27:47 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Jan 2000 16:27:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 22659 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2000 16:27:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9205 Received: (qmail 22651 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2000 16:27:40 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:27:18 -0500 From: Clint Adams To: Sven Wischnowsky Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: dpkg -s style support for _dpkg Message-ID: <20000104112718.A9348@dman.com> References: <200001040914.KAA27374@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i In-Reply-To: <200001040914.KAA27374@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>; from wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de on Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:14:12AM +0100 > > +zstyle -s ':completion${curcontext}:deb:dpkg' status dds > Hm. Why this weird tag name? And why the abbreviated context name? Maybe I don't know what I'm doing. My intent was to have _deb_package completion for dpkg be :deb:dpkg and for apt as :deb:apt; however, I was assuming some overlap which no longer looks reasonable. What abbreviated context name? > And why no docs? ;-) Is zshcompsys the right place for them?