From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14005 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2000 09:17:29 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Feb 2000 09:17:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 4529 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2000 09:17:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9540 Received: (qmail 4521 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2000 09:17:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:17:23 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200002030917.KAA11905@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Wed, 02 Feb 2000 21:16:43 +0000 Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-17 Peter Stephenson wrote: > It still does not include zpty. I suspect I will simply have to add that > and rely on problems being reported, otherwise it will never appear at all. > It might in any case be convenient to have a mechanism for specifying > modules that are not to be compiled or installed --- doing it that way > round prevents the ignorant from leaving out important modules. This would > protect us against uncompilable minor modules because we could say in > Etc/MACHINES that you should use --ignore-modules=zpty on a particular > architecture. Other opinions? No, sounds good. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de