From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15284 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2000 13:36:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Feb 2000 13:36:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 13014 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2000 13:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9604 Received: (qmail 13006 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2000 13:36:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:36:45 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200002071336.OAA19095@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Mon, 7 Feb 2000 07:40:10 +0000 Subject: Re: Undo does too much Bart Schaefer wrote: > 3.1.6-dev-17, zsh -f: > > zagzig% setopt completeinword > zagzig% setopt | less > (output elided) > zagzig% setopt co > zagzig% setopt | less > zagzig% setopt c > > Hey, where did the 'o' go? We undid two changes, not one. (The setopts > are irrelevant, they're just sample input.) Just adding some fuel: there is also still the problem that the first undo after a completion with an automatically inserted suffix doesn't seem to have an effect (in reality, it has: auto-removing the suffix and undoing it back in). I once tried to fix that but failed completely because of the rather difficult undo-recording logic. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de