From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2864 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2000 09:38:35 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Feb 2000 09:38:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 26847 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2000 09:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9707 Received: (qmail 26838 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2000 09:38:29 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:38:20 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200002140938.KAA08906@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Fri, 11 Feb 2000 19:38:02 +0000 Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-18 Peter Stephenson wrote: > Beta testers not following everything in detail should notice that > $compmatchers has been replaced by a completer and a style. Namely, to do > > compmatchers=(blah1 blah2 ...) > > instead do > > zstyle ':completion:*' completer _matcher .... > zstyle ':completion:*' matcher blah1 blah2 ... This would have a different effect... See 9657 and follow-ups (or the docs). It's something like: zstyle ... completer _matcher _complete _matcher _complete ... zstyle ':completion:*:matcher-1:*' matcher blah1 zstyle ':completion:*:matcher-2:*' matcher blah2 If this looks weird to anyone, please join the discussion in 9678, 9679 and tell us what you think about what I said in the latter. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de