From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19598 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2000 09:17:47 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 13 Mar 2000 09:17:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 2730 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2000 09:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10101 Received: (qmail 2721 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2000 09:17:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:17:34 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200003130917.KAA13907@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:34:01 +0000 Subject: Re: ksh (with PATCH) Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Mar 10, 4:33pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > } Subject: ksh (with PATCH) > } > } - Two problems with `|&': > } - The pipe-code was put in the wrong place. > } - SEPERs weren't skipped. > > You can't trust ksh's tests of |&, can you? It means something entirely > different in ksh. I didn't. The ksh-test just showed the two bugs in our parsing of `|&'. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de