From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2821 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2000 16:56:31 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Mar 2000 16:56:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 17080 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2000 16:56:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10201 Received: (qmail 17073 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2000 16:56:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:56:11 +0000 From: Adam Spiers To: Zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: CVS ? Message-ID: <20000322165611.A18419@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mail-Followup-To: Zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk References: <20000322150928.A19079@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> <1000322165019.ZM1475@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <1000322165019.ZM1475@candle.brasslantern.com>; from schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com on Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 04:50:19PM +0000 X-Home-Page: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/ X-OS: Linux 2.2.12 i686 Bart Schaefer (schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com) wrote: > On Mar 22, 3:09pm, Ollivier Robert wrote: > } Subject: CVS ? > } > } Is there any progress on the Sourceforge front ? Or has anyone started > } their own CVS repository ? > > I thought Adam was waiting for a reply on whether sourceforge was willing > to host the sources under the zsh license. Adam? Still waiting :-( I'll give them another gentle poke now ... > } Will there be snapshots again ? > > PWS has indicated he'll be starting up again soon. I sent him a list of > the patches since -dev-19 (up through article 10168) a couple days ago. > > I'm now generally of the opinion that we should go ahead with sourceforge > if they're OK with the license; initialize it by grabbing Tanaka's CVSROOT > with cvsup and worry about the mailing lists later (probably, much later). Except that his cvsupd stopped running a while ago, I think. Not that that's a problem; I'm probably not the only one with a mirror of it. > However, having waited this long, we might as well wait for PWS to give > his opinion. Agreed. He is the coordinator after all :-) Adam -- very much looking forward to getting the latest code again (haven't even got the wordcode stuff yet ...)