From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-10252-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 13633 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2000 00:50:44 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Mar 2000 00:50:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 9575 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2000 00:50:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 10252
Received: (qmail 9560 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2000 00:50:33 -0000
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 00:50:31 +0000
From: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
To: zsh workers mailing list <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: zsh license preventing move to sourceforge.net? (fwd)
Message-ID: <20000326005031.A18407@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
Mail-Followup-To: zsh workers mailing list <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
X-Home-Page: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/
X-OS: Linux 2.2.12 i686

----- Forwarded message from Drew Streib <ds@varesearch.com> -----

Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:05:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Drew Streib <ds@varesearch.com>
To: Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net>
Cc: dtype@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: zsh license preventing move to SF?
X-Parp-Accepted: sourceforge.net

I've looked at this and it doesn't appear to conflict with any part of the
OSI definition. I would approve the license on this. :)

-drew

-------
Drew Streib <d@valinux.com> 408.542.5725

Sr Developer, Community Liason, SourceForge | <dtype@sourceforge.net>
System Administrator, Linux International   | <dtype@li.org>
Information Architect, VA Linux Systems     | <dtype@valinux.com>
Admirer, Occasional Programmer, Linux.com   | <dtype@linux.com>

On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Adam Spiers wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> I sent this question to dlb but got no response.  Maybe
> you're a more suitable victim ;-)
> 
> The zsh developers would like to move our codebase to
> sourceforge.  However, while zsh is released under a license
> entirely within the spirit of free software (similar to the
> GPL, see below), it's not technically OSI approved.  Would
> this be a problem?  A swift response would be most
> appreciated!
> 
> Adam
> 
> #
> # Copyright (c) 1995-1997 Richard Coleman
> # All rights reserved.
> #
> # Permission is hereby granted, without written agreement
> and without
> # license or royalty fees, to use, copy, modify, and
> distribute this
> # software and to distribute modified versions of this
> software for any
> # purpose, provided that the above copyright notice and the
> following
> # two paragraphs appear in all copies of this software.
> #
> # In no event shall Richard Coleman or the Zsh Development
> Group be liable
> # to any party for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or
> consequential
> # damages arising out of the use of this software and its
> documentation,
> # even if Richard Coleman and the Zsh Development Group have
> been advised of
> # the possibility of such damage.
> #
> # Richard Coleman and the Zsh Development Group specifically
> disclaim any
> # warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied
> warranties of
> # merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.  The
> software
> # provided hereunder is on an "as is" basis, and Richard
> Coleman and the
> # Zsh Development Group have no obligation to provide
> maintenance,
> # support, updates, enhancements, or modifications.
> #
> 
> 


----- End forwarded message -----