From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2929 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2000 11:00:38 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Mar 2000 11:00:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 19631 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2000 11:00:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10273 Received: (qmail 19619 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2000 11:00:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:00:25 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200003271100.NAA03746@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Tanaka Akira's message of 25 Mar 2000 03:38:55 +0900 Subject: Re: PATCH: _xwit Tanaka Akira wrote: > ... > > But, this doesn't work because [[ -prefix [0-9]# ]] is failed even > when $PREFIX is empty: > > Z(2):akr@is27e1u11% Src/zsh -f > is27e1u11% bindkey -e; autoload -U compinit; compinit -D; compdef _tst tst > is27e1u11% _tst () { if [[ -prefix [0-9]# ]]; then compadd succ; else compadd fail; fi } > is27e1u11% tst > -> > is27e1u11% tst fail Oops. Wrong security test. Bye Sven diff -ru ../z.old/Src/Zle/complete.c Src/Zle/complete.c --- ../z.old/Src/Zle/complete.c Mon Mar 27 12:49:45 2000 +++ Src/Zle/complete.c Mon Mar 27 12:58:11 2000 @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ char *p, sav; if (!(l = strlen(compprefix))) - return 0; + return ((na == 1 || na == -1) && pattry(pp, compprefix)); if (na < 0) { p = compprefix + l; na = -na; @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ char *p; if (!(ol = l = strlen(compsuffix))) - return 0; + return ((na == 1 || na == -1) && pattry(pp, compsuffix)); if (na < 0) { p = compsuffix; na = -na; -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de