From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26900 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2000 07:54:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Mar 2000 07:54:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 28909 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2000 07:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10290 Received: (qmail 28896 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2000 07:54:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:54:00 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200003280754.JAA09884@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Sun, 26 Mar 2000 23:19:08 +0100 Subject: Re: PATCH: file-patterns, tag-order, tag-aliases Peter Stephenson wrote: > Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > > zstyle ... tag-order 'globbed-files directories' all-files > > > > This can now be done using only the file-patterns style: > > > > zstyle ':completion:*' file-patterns '%p *(-/):globbed-files' '*:all-files' > > Does this still work properly for directories? I'm probably remembering > the old days where the glob pattern worked very differently from full > directory completion, but it makes me a bit nervous. Bart asked the same lately. As far as I can remember, the only difference between `compctl -g "*(-/)"' and `compctl -/' was the handling of directory names starting with a dot. And _path_files should handle that correctly. If you could tell me other differences or if you know how _path_files behaves differently, please tell me. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de