From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10257 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 09:16:42 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Apr 2000 09:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 25980 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2000 09:16:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10453 Received: (qmail 25969 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 09:16:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:16:29 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200004040916.LAA04923@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Adam Spiers's message of Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:08:01 +0100 Subject: Re: web pages Adam Spiers wrote: > Oliver Kiddle (opk@u.genie.co.uk) wrote: > > ... > > > I also have a number of AIX and IRIX specific completions as well as > > some which are specific to particular commercial applications (e.g. > > Rational Apex). Where should this sort of thing go? > > Personally I really like the `out-of-the-box-ness' of the new > completion system, and would like to see that continue as much as > possible. We already have a few platform-specific completions, and > adding more are hardly doing any harm. Agreed. And people who have platform-dependent completion functions they want to add might want to start thinking about the final directory layout... ;-) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de