From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10273 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 09:19:39 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Apr 2000 09:19:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 27593 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2000 09:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10454 Received: (qmail 27580 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 09:19:32 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:19:21 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200004040919.LAA04947@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:01:42 +0400 Subject: Re: Bug report interface comments Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > I tried to submit a (possible) bug, but what I do not like, that I have > to have a logon there. Else bug comes from none. Normally, I have a > field to enter mail address. It cannot be expected, that every user that > wants to submit a bug report will get login - that means, you have no > way to communicate with submitter. Erm... could we, until we have some automatic forwarding from the bug manager to zsh-workers, agree that full bug descriptions be sent to zsh-workers, too? Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de