From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5893 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 14:33:25 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Apr 2000 14:33:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 24265 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2000 14:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10468 Received: (qmail 24252 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 14:33:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:33:14 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200004041433.QAA00831@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Closing bugs (?) Sourceforge supports the `fixed' and `closed' states. Hm, do we want to leave it to one of the administrators to actually close a bug or should the person who fixed (or tried to fix) it do that? And why this distinction? Bye Sven P.S.: 103797, 103798 -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de