From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11624 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2000 08:38:44 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Apr 2000 08:38:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 9285 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2000 08:38:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10572 Received: (qmail 9271 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2000 08:38:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:38:00 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200004070838.KAA23696@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Bart Schaefer's message of Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: PATCH: AIX dep.&doc fix; development guidelines Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Zefram wrote: > > > I'd forgotten that that form would clash with old subversion numbers. > > I'm going to skip ahead 100 numbers, therefore, to get past that clash. > > I suggest that everyone else using this scheme start off at patch > > "pws100" etc. > > OK, I'm almost convinced to give in. Can I make one request? > > At the time an actual release is done, will the maintainer (hi, Peter) > please do a sweep of the ChangeLog and convert all the "zefram1XX" etc. > into the actual article numbers? Placing the burden on Peter again... Hm, that's not as kind as I would like to be. And searching all those numbers is a rather tedious job. I'm torn in two, especially because I find the (real) message numbers rather convenient myself. And I've just finished my emacs-lisp support for all this stuff... Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de