From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18764 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 12:35:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Apr 2000 12:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 26108 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2000 12:34:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10696 Received: (qmail 26097 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 12:34:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:34:32 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200004121234.OAA09838@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:26:15 +0400 Subject: Re: Should we backup this change? RE: Modifier substitutions. Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > There was no reply ... so I ask once more: should we backup this change? I would be in favour of that. The possible confusion when forgetting to check/quote the `#' and `%' at the beginning of parameters used there is more important than the advantage, I think. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de