From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28392 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2000 23:37:49 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Apr 2000 23:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2849 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2000 23:37:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11035 Received: (qmail 2831 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2000 23:37:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 09:37:34 +1000 From: Geoff Wing To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 Message-ID: <20000501093734.A28134@primenet.com.au> References: <1000412081220.ZM11853@candle.brasslantern.com> <20000417105803.A25633@primenet.com.au> <1000424025822.ZM30224@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <1000424025822.ZM30224@candle.brasslantern.com>; from schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 02:58:22AM +0000 Organization: PrimeNet Computer Consultancy Bart Schaefer wrote about Re: 3.1.6-dev-22: :Nevertheless, this is only an issue if a command (the echo in the sample) :leaves the cursor above some portion of a screenful of output. Does that :happen to you a lot? Yes. Running multiple programs which use secondary screens, e.g. ``screen'' and something else which uses curses (or similar), and primary/secondary screen independent cursor positions. It _might_ not be a major handicap without the latter. :I'm sure some test other than `&& isset(ALWAYSLASTPROMPT)' would be better; :if it's not clearing for the completion code's benefit then whether we've :returned to the previous prompt is irrelevant (e.g., if Geoff's arguments :aren't convincing then maybe we should remove that CLEAREOD entirely). Regards, -- Geoff Wing : Work URL: http://www.primenet.com.au/ Rxvt Stuff : Ego URL : http://pobox.com/~gcw/ Zsh Stuff : Phone : (Australia) 0413 431 874