zsh-workers
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Re: 3.1.7-pre-2
@ 2000-05-02 11:45 Sven Wischnowsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sven Wischnowsky @ 2000-05-02 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zsh-workers


Bart Schaefer wrote:

> On Apr 30,  4:45pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> } Subject: Re: 3.1.7-pre-1 for the workers
> }
> } I have a couple of issues that came up after the prerelease to resolve.
> } 
> } The "read -q" bug that Sven patched in 10727.
> 
> So ... 10727 makes this work:
> 
> 	zsh -c "read -q '?Can you see this? '" < /dev/null
> 
> But the following still sends the prompt to the redirected stderr, which
> seems wrong to me:
> 
> 	zsh -c "read -q '?Can you see this? '" < /dev/null >& /dev/null
> 
> The goal is to read from the tty only after also prompting there.  Patch
> follows for consideration; I have not committed it, pending commentary.
> The first hunk is the interesting one: It seems to me there's never any
> longer a reason to send the prompt to stderr, but I may be missing some
> case where ZLE is active and yet SHTTY == -1.  (?)

Actually, I was tempted to do the same when I sent the patch, then
tried to act minimally invasive or something like that -- and couldn't 
think of the example you gave.

> The other two hunks just avoid a redundant close().

Oops. If you commit the patch... there is similar code in bin_vared()
in zle_main.c. Implemented by the same idiot. Ahem.


Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.1.7-pre-1 for the workers
@ 2000-04-26 18:43 Peter Stephenson
  2000-04-27  1:11 ` Oliver Kiddle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Stephenson @ 2000-04-26 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zsh hackers list

"Bart Schaefer" wrote:
> I just noticed this in the zsh-users announcement:
> 
> Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } This means it's now time to start smoothing the remaining rough corners of
> } for the release, which I hope will be the last before 4.0.1.
> 
> 4.0.1 ?  Are we going to skip 4.0.0 this time?  Why?

Everyone knows versions ending in `0' don't work.  But it's only really
because I'm one of the few people left who believes first things have a `1'
at the end.  I have no strong views.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Work: pws@CambridgeSiliconRadio.com
Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2000-05-02 11:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-05-02 11:45 3.1.7-pre-2 Sven Wischnowsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-04-26 18:43 3.1.7-pre-1 for the workers Peter Stephenson
2000-04-27  1:11 ` Oliver Kiddle
2000-04-27  9:23   ` Bart Schaefer
2000-04-28 15:51     ` Oliver Kiddle
2000-04-30 16:45       ` Bart Schaefer
2000-04-30 21:13         ` 3.1.7-pre-2 Peter Stephenson
2000-05-01  2:52           ` 3.1.7-pre-2 Bart Schaefer

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).