From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4648 invoked from network); 4 May 2000 14:52:50 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 May 2000 14:52:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 215 invoked by alias); 4 May 2000 14:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11155 Received: (qmail 208 invoked from network); 4 May 2000 14:52:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:52:26 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005041452.QAA12154@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Wed, 3 May 2000 10:51:11 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: PATCH: yet another match-spec-cursor bug I wrote: > Felix Rosencrantz wrote: > > ... > > > If I try completing "bui", I rarely I get only "build" or more often I get the > > following sequence after hitting tab: > > bui --> build.out[] --> build[.]out --> build.out[] --> build.out1[] > > --> build.out2[] > > > > Most times I get the correct behavior. Though within several attempts I get > > the > > described incorrect behavior. > > That's bad news: not always repeatable. I've tried it for quite some > time now and still can't reproduce it. I'll continue to try... > > The fact that you don't always get it makes me think that it may be a > problem with an not-initialised variable or memory block. Do you have > configured with mem-debug? > > What really irritates me is that it doesn't go into menu-completion on > the second TAB. Hm. I've now tried it on DU 4.0 and Linux, both with and without mem-debug and still can't reproduce it. Does anyone else see this behaviour? I'm not even completely sure where to look when trying to debug this... Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de