From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 397 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 09:52:48 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 May 2000 09:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 19311 invoked by alias); 17 May 2000 09:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11434 Received: (qmail 19303 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 09:52:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 11:52:13 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005170952.LAA05700@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Wed, 17 May 2000 08:37:35 +0000 Subject: Re: Curiosity: zstyle -a vs. zstyle -h Bart Schaefer wrote: > ... > > An equally good (perhaps even better) alternative would be to drop the -h > option entirely and require the array to be declared if one wants it to be > an assoc. I'd be in favour of this, too (and was already tempted to write it, especially since, as far as I can see, we don't use -h yet). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de