From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29824 invoked from network); 26 May 2000 07:10:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 May 2000 07:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 17538 invoked by alias); 26 May 2000 07:10:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11588 Received: (qmail 17530 invoked from network); 26 May 2000 07:10:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:10:02 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005260710.JAA02813@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Thu, 25 May 2000 15:28:12 +0000 Subject: Re: vared messes up tty state Bart Schaefer wrote: > On May 25, 10:02am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > } Subject: Re: vared messes up tty state > } > } Bart Schaefer wrote: > } > } > Arguably, vared shouldn't even work in this condition (it behaves as > } > if SINGLE_LINE_ZLE, when in fact ZLE is entirely disabled). > } > } I agree with this last one, so should we? > > I think so. Good, I've now committed it (11566). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de