From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-11672-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 2849 invoked from network); 30 May 2000 17:32:19 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 May 2000 17:32:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 24544 invoked by alias); 30 May 2000 17:32:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 11672
Received: (qmail 24537 invoked from network); 30 May 2000 17:32:10 -0000
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 19:31:57 +0200
From: jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Subject: Re: zsh-cvs strange install
In-reply-to: <0FVD007LUT6XJJ@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com>
To: pws@cambridgesiliconradio.com
Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk
Reply-to: jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Message-id: <200005301732.TAA40535@numa1.igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii

On 30 May, Peter Stephenson wrote:
>> The build works fine, but
>> install installs it as
>> zsh@EXEEXT@
> 
> Looks like your configure, or maybe just your config.status, aren't up to
> date.  configure should contain this line:
> 
> s%@EXEEXT@%$EXEEXT%g
> 
> and config.status should contain this line everywhere except where an
> executable extension is actually required:
> 
> s%@EXEEXT@%%g
> 
> as input to sed.  If they are, try re-running config.status.
> 
Yes, that might be zsh-3.1.7 seems to be completely broken
on my IRIX6.5

I have got the fresh zsh-3.1.7.tar.gz by ftp and
have built it as usual.
It now installs fine BUT
a) when invoked from a running shell
   it prints out strange things and doing just a
   cd something
   kills it
   on the system console I get
   waitmap: error starting program
ALERT: Process [zsh] 1490059 generated trap, but has signal 11 held or ignored
        epc 0xfa38278 ra 0x10075df0 badvaddr 0x0
Process has been killed to prevent infinite loop
[ESP System Information Notification]:"ALERT: Process [zsh] 1490059 generated trap, but has signal 11 held or ignored"

b) invoking a new xterm it dies immediately.

Sorry for the bad news,
Helmut.

I'll try generate a debug version to locate the problem a bit.

-- 
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
Institute of Technology, RWTH Aachen
D 52056 Aachen, Germany