From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6065 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 06:50:13 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 06:50:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 18881 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2000 06:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11790 Received: (qmail 18871 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 06:50:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:49:43 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200006070649.IAA11929@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:20:43 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: blah*[TAB] (difference between 3.1.6 and 3.1.9) [moved to workers] I wrote: > Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 3:07am, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > } Subject: blah*[TAB] (difference between 3.1.6 and 3.1.9) > > } > > } Consider a directory where there are two files blah1 and blah2. With > > } zsh 3.1.6, when I typed blah* followed by a tab, "blah1 blah2 " was > > } generated (with a space after blah2). With zsh 3.1.9, "blah1 blah2" > > } is generated (with *no* space after blah2). > > } > > } How can I have the old behavior (much more logical IMHO)? > > > > Something's definitely gone wrong with expand-or-complete. This was not > > intentional. > > Ahem. Changed in 9777 in reply to 9756 (guess the author). > > 9777 commented out some stuff in doexpansion(). Change it back? I want to get that from my todo-list. Should we change it back? Bart (9765 was from you)? Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de