From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17264 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2000 17:41:53 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jun 2000 17:41:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 25433 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2000 17:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11828 Received: (qmail 25426 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2000 17:41:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 13:41:31 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: Sven Wischnowsky Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: "antecedents" [was Re: a couple of completion questions] Message-ID: <20000608134131.A17203@scowler.net> References: <200006080936.LAA19790@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200006080936.LAA19790@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>; from wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de on Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 11:36:31AM +0200 > Hm, should we add an option, to be combined with -A (or an argument to > -A?) to tell it that it should consider words starting with [-+] to be > arguments? Or, probably better, let -A take an argument, a pattern and > all words matching it are not taken to be arguments and hence don't > keep it from completing option. I like the pattern idea a lot.