From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4840 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2000 09:43:07 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Jun 2000 09:43:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17346 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2000 09:42:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11887 Received: (qmail 17339 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2000 09:42:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 08:17:58 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200006140617.IAA00885@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:25:43 +0000 Subject: Re: What happened to article 11864? Bart Schaefer wrote: > I got a Cc of it by private mail, but it never reached the archives and I > never saw the original across the list. (I believe what I got to be 11864 > because it arrived between 11863 and 11865 and both of those *are* in the > archive; as a Cc, it of course had no X-Seq field.) > > The message was from Alexandre and I thought it was for the bug that Sven > just patched in 11875, but perhaps it was for a different one (and I didn't > save a copy) of the message). I wondered about this, too. Especially when I found it in the ChangeLog. My 11864 is your `diff #'. And I'd like to see that patch (and description, if any). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de