From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18614 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2000 09:09:20 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Jun 2000 09:09:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 20455 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2000 09:09:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11917 Received: (qmail 20447 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2000 09:09:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 11:09:00 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200006150909.LAA06257@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Thu, 15 Jun 2000 10:26:38 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: expansion I forgot: > 2) Not using `recexact' as the style name was, of course, intentional, > because it really isn't about `recognising', is it? It's about > accepting the exact match (it will always take an exact match as > one of the possible matches[1]). [1] Has anyone else wished he had a style to say `complete anything *but* an exact match'? We already have ignore-line... we could extend that. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de