Re: bug in _mutt ?

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>]

Andy Spiegl wrote:

> I did just now (didn't know this feature till now), but I must admit, that
> I don't understand the output.  I'll attach it to this mail for the
> experts.  I assume the relevant part is here:
> 
>  trace _all_labels:39(while else)> -M m:{A-Za-z}=3D{a-zA-Z} -F _comp_ignore=
>  -J files -X =1B[01;33mmailbox specification=1B[22;36m files expl mailbox s=
> pecification
>  _all_labels:39: command not found: -M

Much more interesting is this line:

> trace _mailboxes:41()> _wanted files expl mailbox specification

It shows that you are *not* using the _mailboxes file from dev-1, that 
doesn't call _wanted. And, as I said in an earlier mail, we had some
problems with _wanted (and very similar output) in earlier versions.

Maybe you have the old versions somewhere in your $fpath where they
are found before the current ones?

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de