Re: bug in _mutt ?

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>]

I wrote:

> Andy Spiegl wrote:
> 
> > I did just now (didn't know this feature till now), but I must admit, that
> > I don't understand the output.  I'll attach it to this mail for the
> > experts.  I assume the relevant part is here:
> > 
> >  trace _all_labels:39(while else)> -M m:{A-Za-z}=3D{a-zA-Z} -F _comp_ignore=
> >  -J files -X =1B[01;33mmailbox specification=1B[22;36m files expl mailbox s=
> > pecification
> >  _all_labels:39: command not found: -M
> 
> Much more interesting is this line:
> 
> > trace _mailboxes:41()> _wanted files expl mailbox specification
> 
> It shows that you are *not* using the _mailboxes file from dev-1, that 
> doesn't call _wanted. And, as I said in an earlier mail, we had some
> problems with _wanted (and very similar output) in earlier versions.
> 
> Maybe you have the old versions somewhere in your $fpath where they
> are found before the current ones?

Just had another look... your _setup is up-to-date, maybe you copied
only _mailboxes somewhere?

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de