From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4490 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2000 12:29:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Jun 2000 12:29:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 24316 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2000 12:29:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12004 Received: (qmail 24307 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2000 12:29:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:28:42 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200006201228.OAA02234@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Sven Wischnowsky's message of Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:21:00 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: bug in _mutt ? I wrote: > Andy Spiegl wrote: > > > I did just now (didn't know this feature till now), but I must admit, that > > I don't understand the output. I'll attach it to this mail for the > > experts. I assume the relevant part is here: > > > > trace _all_labels:39(while else)> -M m:{A-Za-z}=3D{a-zA-Z} -F _comp_ignore= > > -J files -X =1B[01;33mmailbox specification=1B[22;36m files expl mailbox s= > > pecification > > _all_labels:39: command not found: -M > > Much more interesting is this line: > > > trace _mailboxes:41()> _wanted files expl mailbox specification > > It shows that you are *not* using the _mailboxes file from dev-1, that > doesn't call _wanted. And, as I said in an earlier mail, we had some > problems with _wanted (and very similar output) in earlier versions. > > Maybe you have the old versions somewhere in your $fpath where they > are found before the current ones? Just had another look... your _setup is up-to-date, maybe you copied only _mailboxes somewhere? Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de