From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12431 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2000 06:50:21 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Jul 2000 06:50:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11092 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2000 06:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12361 Received: (qmail 11085 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2000 06:50:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:50:04 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007250650.IAA06314@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:01:49 +0400 Subject: Re: noglob and _match Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > bor@itsrm2% noglob ls *TAB > > bor@itsrm2% noglob ls Brodsky/ > Completing file > Brodsky/ addrbook.d/ dikz/ observe/ test/ > ..... > > Is it correct in this case? I suspect, the same aplies to _expand as > well. Why not? I mean: you explicitly requested completion, so the completion system *must* think that you know what you're doing. And it's pretty damn useful, I'd say. *Especially* with noglob (and even more if that noglob is hidden in an alias). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de